Thursday, April 30, 2009

The Most Recent Office Vacancy Rates Do Not Seem To Be In Line With Job Losses

Think about this for a moment. We've had MASSIVE job losses, the worst economy since the great depression-16 months into it, yet office vacancy rates are around 12%. I've seen estimates that the overall negative absorption is only around 15 to 25 million square feet. Hardly much inventory at all. The early 1990's witnessed a peak vacancy rate of 13%. Look to your left, now look to your right, isn't this economy much worse?

I think that there is a huge discrepancy between what is available for lease and what is hidden, or off market. When you look back at the last real estate correction (2001) in our target market (California), it was primarily related to the tech bubble. Small technology companies they were supposed to grow 100 fold in five years swallowed millions of square feet of office space. After they blew up, immediately their office space went on the market, it was either absorbed, or it would sit on the shelf as inventory. You knew about the available space. What I think we are seeing now, and my point, it that vacancy rates should be a lot higher for the simple reason that the companies that are initiating layoffs, are major FORTUNE 500 companies. They are very reluctant to surrender nice sizable properties for the simple reason that it is so hard to acquire properties that fit their needs. Many large companies probably expect to rehire, the economy to turn around soon, or various other reasons to hang in there. But if this does not happen quickly, they will be forced to unload. Much different attitude than a small tech company with 100 employees.

My feeling is there are lots of unlisted office space available that are not being reflected in the most recent vacancy rate reports. Reality is that the true vacancy rate could be in the high teens. That puts tremendous pressure on values....and creates more situations for us to sniff around in and buy the right property at our price.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Great Cover Article in the WSJ today about how Delinquency Rates on Commercial Real Estate Loans are Skyrocketing

On one hand, I'm shocked at the accelerated pace of defaults. I thought we
would see these levels in several months. Not now! On the other hand, this
is what we want. Our main focus is commercial Real Estate in California.
With the amount of delinquencies coming, that translates into lots of distressed
sales in our target markets. There will be many opportunities to pick our
"pitch to hit". My prediction is that we will have two or three times the
amount of inventory to choose from in a short while.

Highlights for the Wall Street Journal article:
  • Commercial Real Estate loan defaults have doubled since September
  • US Banks could suffer as much as $250bb in commercial r/e related losses in this downturn versus $48bb in the recession of the early 1990's
  • Declines in Commercial r/e could be between 35% to 45%
  • Of the estimated $154bb in Commercial r/e loans coming due over the next three years, 2/3 may not qualify for refinancing

Monday, March 9, 2009

Opportunties are here.

The Stella Capital is seeking prospective real estate investments. As one of the only "100% cash, quick close" buyers in our target market, many real estate brokers are giving us first shot of their inventory. We are finding real estate sellers with numerous reasons to sell, the most prevalent being the inability to refinance current loans. We have also seen many local California bankers reaching out to either sell a discounted note on property or directly sell real estate that they currently own. As cash buyers of real estate we are able to pick and choose the most profitable deals and take advantage of this depressed real estate market.